![]() No ability to do a static calibration or "stomp test" See FAQ item #5 for more information on this – once you understand what is/isn't happening, it's largely manageable.Ĭ. Whether this translates into any tangible training benefit is debatable. The LYC display is limited to 1 screen with 3 data segments. Also, the Garmin displays are numerous and programmable, with up to 3 different screens per sport, and up to 4 data segments per screen. It's "cool" to be able to see everything in one place for analysis after your run/ride. You only have one device to charge, download, update, familiarize yourself with, there's a consistent UI between sports, you don't need to learn morse code to change settings, etc. More on the differences between the Elite+/Pro+/SL+/SLC+ below. This approach also lets you purchase the PT Elite+ (the entry level wireless model) instead of the Pro+ (the next step up). no duplicate head unit, HR strap, cradle, cables, etc.). ![]() It's cheaper because you don't end up buying two units that essentially do the same thing (i.e. This solution is cheaper - especially if you're considering a Garmin for the run anyway. Why go with the 310XT instead of just using the LYC?Ī lot of people are interested in power but scared by the cost. Whether or not the tradeoffs are worth it to you is something that you need to evaluate and decide.ģ. There are solutions to many, but not all, of these problems. I) If you get into a situation where you need to troubleshoot the hub with Saris' help, you will need a LYC. H) Some people that are exploring this as an option are new to power (like me). G) There have been some problems with how various software packages deal with data from the 310XT. The brief backstory is that Garmin essentially treated early adopters as beta testers for months with repeated buggy firmware revisions until, finally, it seems to be largely stable/reliable.ĭ) There are differences between the 705 and 310XT in terms of what they do/don't do.Į) It's unclear what procedures you can and should follow (and there's confusion regarding the terminology) for things like calibration, auto-zero, zero averaging, auto pause, etc.į) There is not a lot of carefully gathered data comparing 310XT and LYC. Those that weren't burned personally certainly read a lot about it. And, of course, it's made by the guys that make the hub.ī) It's unclear what you can/can't do with the 310XT as compared to the LYC.Ĭ) People feel burned by how Garmin treated people with the Edge 705. It's been around forever and a lot of people have it, so there is more familiarity and comfort with it. Put in checking to prevent a failure in certain computer power down situations.First of all, I think there are a few reasons for the FUD:Ī) The gold standard is obviously the regular PowerTap head unit, or "Little Yellow Computer" (LYC) as it's affectionately known.Added corrections to prevent invalid conversions from specific types of TCX data to the FIT equivalent.Made change to prevent application failure if Garmin ANT Agent is unable to rename the user’s device.Made application more tolerant of certain irregularities in the registry.Decreased CPU usage when the application was running with no ANT USB stick connected to the computer.Fixed issue where Garmin ANT Agent would not successfully connect to a Forerunner 610 if the device was in low power mode.Fixed issue where Garmin ANT Agent could fail on certain hardware configurations when the program was auto-launched during Windows start. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |